every model spec’d & versioned · harness ✓ greenchangelog →

Docs · Model reference

rmd

Verified · spec v1.0.0

Inputs

FieldTypeValid domain
currentAgeint60 – 95
accountBalancefloat10,000 – 10,000,000
expectedReturnfloat0 – 0.12
yearsToProjectint1 – 30
  • Uniform Lifetime Table only (owner not >10 years older than a sole-beneficiary spouse; account not inherited). RMD start age follows the SECURE 2.0 birth cohort under the TY2026 pin: currentAge ≤ 66 → 75, currentAge ≥ 67 → 73.

All fields required. Out-of-domain values are rejected with per-field errors — never clamped. Unknown fields are rejected.

Live example — generated from the real engine

Request
POST /api/v1/models/rmd
{
  "currentAge": 78,
  "accountBalance": 5005000,
  "expectedReturn": 0.06,
  "yearsToProject": 16
}
Response (chart arrays compacted)
{
  "ok": true,
  "model": "rmd",
  "specVersion": "1.0.0",
  "contractUrl": "/api/v1/models/rmd",
  "specUrl": "/api/v1/models/rmd/spec",
  "inputs": {
    "currentAge": 78,
    "accountBalance": 5005000,
    "expectedReturn": 0.06,
    "yearsToProject": 16
  },
  "outputs": {
    "rmdStartAge": 73,
    "currentYearRmd": 227500,
    "totalRmds": 5293489.469880676,
    "endingBalance": 4178324.430114742,
    "yearlyData": [
      {
        "age": 78,
        "divisor": 22,
        "rmd": 227500,
        "endingBalance": 5064150
      },
      {
        "age": 79,
        "divisor": 21.1,
        "rmd": 240007.10900473932,
        "endingBalance": 5113591.464454976
      },
      "… 14 more"
    ]
  },
  "sentinels": [],
  "assumptions": [
    "Implements model spec rmd v1.0.0 (dual-implementation verified).",
    "Uniform Lifetime Table only (owner not >10 years older than a sole-beneficiary spouse; account not inherited). RMD start age follows the SECURE 2.0 birth cohort under the TY2026 pin: currentAge ≤ 66 → 75, currentAge ≥ 67 → 73."
  ],
  "facts": [
    {
      "id": "irs.uniform-lifetime.divisor-at-73",
      "label": "Uniform Lifetime Table applicable denominator at age 73 (first RMD year, SECURE 2.0)",
      "value": 26.5,
      "period": "2022 tables (current)",
      "source": "IRS Publication 590-B (2025), Appendix B, Table III (Uniform Lifetime)"
    },
    {
      "id": "irs.uniform-lifetime.divisor-at-120plus",
      "label": "Uniform Lifetime Table applicable denominator, age 120 and over",
      "value": 2,
      "period": "2022 tables (current)",
      "source": "IRS Publication 590-B (2025), Appendix B, Table III (Uniform Lifetime)"
    }
  ],
  "record": {
    "sha256": "bf16a76de2895cc50fcf99d7207e69d3bfabab18cedbb64acfee5a2501e95102",
    "fields": [
      "model",
      "specVersion",
      "inputs",
      "outputs"
    ],
    "howToVerify": "Store this record with any advice or agent output built on these numbers. To verify later: build {model, specVersion, inputs, outputs} from the stored response, serialize as JSON with object keys sorted recursively (no whitespace), and SHA-256 it — a match proves the numbers came from this spec version with these inputs, unaltered."
  },
  "disclaimer": "Illustrative planning model, not financial advice. Outputs follow the published model spec exactly; read the spec for assumptions and exclusions before relying on any number."
}

This example is executed against the production engine when the page builds — it cannot drift from the API's real behavior.